|
Post by Bret Walker on Sept 25, 2002 10:08:53 GMT -5
Recent reports on experiments with mice have given wide publicity to a theory that cigarette smoking is in some way linked with lung cancer in human beings.
Although conducted by doctors of professional standing, these experiments are not regarded as conclusive in the field of cancer research. However, we do not believe that any serious medical research, even though its results are inconclusive, should be disregarded or lightly dismissed.
At the same time, we feel it is in the public interest to call attention to the fact that eminent doctors and research scientists have publicly questioned the claimed significance of these experiments.
Distinguished authorities point out:
1. That medical research of recent years indicates many possible causes of lung cancer. 2. That there is no agreement among the authorities regarding what the cause is. 3. That there is no proof that cigarette smoking is one of the causes. 4. That statistics purporting to link cigarette smoking with the disease could apply with equal force to any one of many other aspects of modern life. Indeed, the validity of the statistics themselves is questioned by numerous scientists.
We accept an interest in people's health as a basic responsibility, paramount to every other consideration in our business.
We believe the products we make are not injurous to health.
We always have and always will cooperate closely with those whose task it is to safeguard the public health.
|
|
|
Post by Bret Walker on Sept 25, 2002 10:15:49 GMT -5
For more than 300 years tobacco has given solace, relaxation, and enjoyment to mankind. At one time or another during those years critics have held it responsible for practically every disease of the human body. One by one these charges have been abandoned for lack of evidence. Regardless of the record of the past, the fact that cigarette smoking today should even be suspected as a cause of a serious disease is a matter of deep concern to us. Many people have asked us what we are doing to meet the public's concern aroused by the recent reports. Here is the answer: 1. We are pledging aid and assistance to the research effort into all phases of tobacco use and health. This joint financial aid will of course be in addition to what is already being contributed by individual companies. 2. For this purpose we are establishing a joint industry group consisting initially of the undersigned. This group will be know as TOBACCO INDUSTRY RESEARCH COMMITTEE. 3. In charge of the resarch activities of the Committee will be a scientist of unimpeachable integrity and national repute. In addition there will be an Advisory Board of scientists disinterested in the cigarette industry. A group of distinguished men from medicine, science, and education will be invited to serve on this Board. These scientists will advise the committee on its research activities. This statement is being issued because we believe the people are entitled to know where we stand on this matter and what we intend to do about it. TOBACCO INDUSTRY RESEARCH COMMITTEE 5400 EMPIRE STATE BUILDING, NEW YORK, N.Y.
|
|
|
Post by Kexpakki on Sept 30, 2002 20:00:32 GMT -5
I dont smoke but i use mouthtobacco mmmmmmm....
|
|
|
Post by Bret Walker on Sept 30, 2002 20:25:19 GMT -5
I tried chewing tobacco a couple times, I never cared for it much, but at least I could do it during school hours.
I smoked for years, but I quit about 6 years ago and I haven't had one since.
I don't have anything against smokers, I have things against the tobacco industry for putting out propaganda like this letter from 1954.
|
|
Lost
Charter Dork
Posts: 0
|
Post by Lost on Sept 30, 2002 20:39:15 GMT -5
i smoke when i can find NAt Surman mints...they are sooo expensive but i go though them like candy
|
|
|
Post by Kexpakki on Sept 30, 2002 20:39:41 GMT -5
No im not talking about chewing tobacco i mean mouthtobacco the stuff you put in your lip and makes you look like a monkey
and chewing tobacco is yukky
|
|
Lost
Charter Dork
Posts: 0
|
Post by Lost on Sept 30, 2002 20:58:44 GMT -5
iv never seen that..where might i find that?
|
|
|
Post by Bret Walker on Sept 30, 2002 21:52:55 GMT -5
Here in the states we call it "Snuff." You're right, there's a difference.
|
|
Lost
Charter Dork
Posts: 0
|
Post by Lost on Sept 30, 2002 22:08:00 GMT -5
aahh snuff... i havent seen it but i have heard of it
|
|
|
Post by Kexpakki on Oct 3, 2002 19:09:20 GMT -5
This is mouthtobacco a.k.a. Snuff or Snus You shuld try it some time its great the first time i did it i felt like i was passing out ewerything started to spin and stuff and if you are going to try it i recomend General and for bigginers its best to buy in pouches
|
|
|
Post by Bret Walker on Oct 3, 2002 19:48:30 GMT -5
I don't do any kind of tobacco anymore.
|
|
|
Post by Kexpakki on Oct 3, 2002 19:52:06 GMT -5
I don't do any kind of tobacco anymore. Wussy!! ok dont beat me up but i recomend for everyone to try it at least once and for you first time its good to have someone there to help if you cant handle it
|
|
|
Post by Bret Walker on Oct 3, 2002 22:17:53 GMT -5
D00d, I've done snuff, I've done chewing tobacco, I've smoked pipes, cigars, and I smoked cigarettes for the better part of 13 years. I'm done with tobacco. But if that's what floats your boat, more power to ya. ;D
|
|
Lost
Charter Dork
Posts: 0
|
Post by Lost on Oct 5, 2002 13:39:20 GMT -5
I like my Nat Shermans becuz they taste ssooo danm good...i go though them like candy.... other then that i dont do anyt ( except an occasional cigar ) becuz there isnt really anything to get out of it....ill stick to the grass
|
|